Articles published in the NCA journals

Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies

Cloud, Dana L. “The Spiral of Survival.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 17, no. 4 (2020): 369-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829658

• AI Summary: “In “The Spiral of Survival”, Dana L. Cloud explores two contrasting responses to systemic oppression: resignation and revolutionary resistance. She argues that while many individuals succumb to despair and passivity in the face of global injustices such as climate change, racial violence, and economic inequality, there exists a transformative potential in the lived experiences of the oppressed. Drawing from Marxist theory and feminist perspectives, Cloud posits that subjugation can serve as a catalyst for consciousness-raising and collective action. She emphasizes the importance of solidarity and activism in reversing the spiral of survival from mere endurance to active resistance, advocating for a movement toward justice and human flourishing.”

Einertson, Kristen M. “The ‘Keys’ to Unlocking Eastern European (Neo)Nazism: The Search for Narrative Refuge.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 22, no. 5 (2025): 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2025.2503814

• AI Summary: “In this article, Kristen M. Einertson examines the resurgence of neo-Nazism in Eastern Europe, particularly in the context of Russia’s campaign against Ukraine. She argues that understanding this phenomenon requires an analysis of the historical and cultural narratives that have shaped national identities in the region. Einertson explores how these narratives have been manipulated to foster a sense of victimhood and to justify aggressive nationalist ideologies. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the role of media and political discourse in constructing these narratives and the need for critical engagement to counteract their influence.”

Girox, Henry A. “Cultural Politics and Public Intellectuals in the Age of Emerging Fascism.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 21, no. 1 (2024): 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2024.2304272

• AI Summary: “In this article, Henry A. Giroux examines the rise of a contemporary form of fascism characterized by extreme nativism and hostility toward racial integration, which he argues is central to U.S. politics. He contends that this “upgraded” fascism is propagated through mass media, increasingly controlled by a wealthy elite, and is legitimized by political leaders. Giroux emphasizes the critical role of public intellectuals in resisting this authoritarian shift by promoting democratic values, critical pedagogy, and civic engagement. He advocates for a renewed commitment to education as a means to challenge the growing fascist threat and to uphold democratic principles.”

Hartzell, Stephanie L. “Whiteness Feels Good Here: Interrogating White Nationalist Rhetoric on Stormfront.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 17, no. 2 (2020): 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1745858

• AI Summary: “In this article, Stephanie L. Hartzell employs a critical rhetorical framework to analyze white nationalist discourse on Stormfront, a prominent white nationalist online forum. Hartzell explores how Stormfront strategically constructs a sense of belonging and pride among white audiences by appealing to affective states such as common sense and communal identity. The study reveals how the platform navigates and challenges colorblind ideologies, differentiates itself from overt white supremacy, and subtly encourages white racial consciousness. Hartzell argues that these rhetorical strategies serve to normalize and mainstream white nationalism by presenting it as a legitimate and emotionally resonant identity.”

Levina, Marina. “Whiteness and the Joys of Cruelty.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15, no. 1 (2018): 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1435079

• AI Summary: “In “Whiteness and the Joys of Cruelty”, Marina Levina examines the affective dimensions of white supremacy, focusing on how cruelty is not merely a tool of oppression but also a source of pleasure for the oppressor. Drawing from affect theory and critical race studies, Levina explores how white individuals derive satisfaction from the subjugation of others, a phenomenon she terms the “hedonicity of hate.” This pleasure is not incidental but central to the maintenance of racial hierarchies. Levina’s analysis underscores the importance of addressing these emotional and psychological aspects in efforts to dismantle systemic racism.”

Levina, Marina. “Doing Critical Cultural Studies in the Age of Totalitarian Thought.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 22, no. 1 (2025): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2025.2469935

• AI Summary: “In this editorial, Marina Levina reflects on the challenges and responsibilities of critical cultural studies scholars in an era marked by the resurgence of authoritarian ideologies and the erosion of democratic norms. Levina emphasizes the importance of maintaining a critical stance that interrogates power structures, media representations, and cultural narratives that contribute to the normalization of totalitarian thought. She advocates for an engaged scholarship that not only analyzes but also resists oppressive systems, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary approaches and solidarity with marginalized communities. Levina calls for a reinvigoration of critical cultural studies as a vital tool for understanding and combating the forces undermining democratic societies.”

Levina, Marina, and Kumarini Silva. “Cruel Intentions: Affect Theory in the Age of Trump.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15, no. 1 (2018): 70-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1435080

• AI Summary: “In this article, Levina and Silva analyze the rise of affective politics under Donald Trump’s presidency, focusing on how cruelty has become central to political discourse. They argue that Trump’s rhetoric and policies have cultivated an environment where cruelty is not only normalized but also celebrated, resonating with certain segments of the population. Drawing from affect theory, the authors explore how emotions like anger, fear, and joy are mobilized to foster division and reinforce power structures. They emphasize the importance of understanding these emotional dynamics to effectively resist authoritarian tendencies and promote more compassionate political engagement.”

Lizama, Jimmy. “The Trump Administration’s Framing of the MS-13 Gang: Narrowing the Borders of Belonging with Homeland maternity.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 20, no. 3 (2023): 358-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2023.2236187

• AI Summary: “In this article, Jimmy Lizama analyzes how the Trump administration utilized the MS-13 gang to construct an anti-immigrant narrative that specifically targeted Central American communities. He argues that this framing modified traditional anti-Mexican rhetoric by introducing the concept of “homeland maternity,” which redefined the boundaries of national belonging. This narrative positioned Central American immigrants as threats to national security and cultural identity, thereby justifying exclusionary policies and practices. Lizama examines the rhetorical strategies employed to depict these immigrants as inherently dangerous, emphasizing the role of media and political discourse in shaping public perception and policy. The study highlights the intersection of race, immigration, and national identity in the construction of political narratives.”

Mejia, Robert, Kay Beckerman, and Curtis Sullivan. “White Lies: A Racial History of the (Post)Truth.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15, no. 2 (2018): 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1456668

• AI Summary: “In this article, Mejia, Beckermann, and Sullivan critique the notion of a “post-truth era,” arguing that the current climate of misinformation and emotional appeals in political discourse is not a new phenomenon but rather a continuation of longstanding racial biases embedded in American society. They contend that the term “post-truth” obscures the historical realities of racism and the manipulation of truth to uphold white supremacy. Through case studies of American drug and housing policies, the authors demonstrate how these policies have been constructed and justified through narratives that marginalize people of color and reinforce racial hierarchies. By examining these historical contexts, the article challenges the idea that we are entering a new era of truth manipulation, highlighting instead that the manipulation of truth has always been a tool for maintaining racial inequality. “

Parks, Lisa, and Rahul Mukherjee. “From Platform Jumping to Self-Censorship: Internet Freedom, Social Media, and Circumvention Practices in Zambia.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 14, no. 3 (2017): 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2017.1290262

• AI Summary: “In this article, Parks and Mukherjee examine the evolving landscape of internet freedom in Zambia, focusing on the strategies employed by urban users to navigate and resist state-imposed digital censorship. Through qualitative interviews with 42 active ICT and social media users in Lusaka, the authors identify four primary circumvention practices: Platform Jumping: Users switch between different social media platforms to evade detection and suppression of their content; Anonymity: Employing pseudonyms and anonymous accounts to protect personal identity while engaging in online discourse; Self-Censorship: Deliberately withholding or modifying content to avoid potential repercussions from authorities; and Negotiation of Legal Challenges: Engaging with legal frameworks to contest or mitigate the impacts of censorship. The study emphasizes that these practices are not merely technical solutions but are deeply embedded in the socio-political context of Zambia. Rather than viewing circumvention as a set of techniques imported from the global north, the authors argue that it is a set of cultural practices that emerge within particular sociohistorical conditions and platforms of communication. This perspective highlights the agency of Zambian users in shaping their digital experiences and resisting authoritarian control over online spaces.”

Pyatovskaya, Evgeniya, and Julia Khrebran-Hörhager. “To Russia with(out) Love: Ukrainian War Refugees Migrating to the Land of the Aggressor.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 22, no. 2 (2025): 220-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2025.2503822

• AI Summary: “In this article, Pyatovskaya and Khrebtan-Hörhager examine the complex experiences of Ukrainian war refugees who have sought asylum in Russia, the country responsible for the ongoing conflict. The authors explore the paradoxical nature of this migration, highlighting the challenges refugees face in a nation that is both their aggressor and their host. Through qualitative analysis, the study delves into the refugees’ narratives, shedding light on their coping mechanisms, the psychological toll of displacement, and the social dynamics within Russian society. The article contributes to the broader discourse on forced migration, identity, and the geopolitical implications of asylum-seeking in conflict zones.”

Reeves, Joshua. “Rhetoric, Violence, and the Subject of Civility.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 19, no. 1 (2022): 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2022.2030062

• AI Summary: “In this article, Joshua Reeves examines the relationship between rhetoric and violence through the lens of cultural governance. He argues that authorities and institutions cultivate deliberative rhetorical norms to regulate citizens’ political conduct. The opposition between rhetoric and violence is utilized as a “police logic” to suppress radical political action. This logic not only suppresses physical violence but also expands the conceptual domain of violence, leading to the criminalization of certain subjects deemed as violent. Reeves’ analysis highlights how the construction of civility serves as a mechanism for maintaining social order and marginalizing dissenting voices.”

Van Schenck, Reed. “‘Remaking the World Memetically’: Interrogating White Nationalist Subject Formation through the Circulation of the ‘Wagecuck’ Meme.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 20, no. 3 (2023): 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2023.2228867

• AI Summary: “In this article, Reed Van Schenck examines the “wagecuck” meme—a 4chan-originated image featuring a white male character juxtaposed with a “NEET” (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) figure—to analyze how such digital artifacts contribute to white nationalist subject formation. Van Schenck employs a rhetorical materialist framework to explore how these memes circulate tropes of cuckoldry and wage slavery, positioning the white working-class male as a victim of societal structures. The study highlights how these memes encourage identification with a racialized victimhood, promoting a fantasy of agency rooted in antiblackness and class resentment. Van Schenck’s analysis underscores the role of digital media in constructing political identities that intertwine race, class, and gender anxieties to advance white supremacist ideologies.”

Willard, Zane Austin. “Ambivalent Surveillance: Teaching in the Times of Anti-Woke.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 22, no. 1 (2025): 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2024.2439410

• AI Summary: “In this article, Zane Austin Willard examines the current landscape of public education in the United States, focusing on the impact of anti-woke legislation and its implications for educators. Willard introduces the concept of “ambivalent surveillance” to describe the dual role educators play under these laws: simultaneously complicit and resistant. He argues that such legislation, particularly in states like Florida, creates a racialized surveillance regime that censors discussions on race and racial issues, thereby enforcing a white-centric narrative in classrooms. Educators, especially those of color, find themselves navigating a precarious balance between adhering to institutional policies and upholding their commitment to teaching about race and racial justice. The article highlights the emotional and professional challenges faced by teachers under these constraints and discusses strategies for resistance within the classroom.”

Zou, Sheng. “When Nationalism Meets Hip-Hop: Aestheticized Politics of Ideotainment in China.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16, no. 3 (2019): 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1637008

• AI Summary: “In this article, Sheng Zou examines the intersection of grassroots youth culture and state-led ideological efforts in China, focusing on the patriotic hip-hop music videos produced by the Chinese youth band CD Rev. Zou analyzes how the Chinese government co-opts popular cultural formats, particularly hip-hop, to promote state-centric ideology. By integrating symbols of both tradition and modernity, these music videos aim to localize and sanitize hip-hop as a medium of propaganda. The study discusses the limitations of such co-optative tactics, highlighting the tradeoff between ideological control and authentic expressivity, and the risk of de-sublimating cultural symbols for political persuasion.”

Communication and Democracy (previously First Amendment Studies)

Carlson, Caitlin Ring. “Hate Speech as a Structural Phenomenon.” First Amendment Studies 54, no. 2 (2020): 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2020.1837649

• AI Summary: “In this article, Caitlin Ring Carlson argues that hate speech should be understood not merely as isolated instances of offensive language but as a structural phenomenon embedded within societal power dynamics. She posits that individuals in positions of power utilize verbal assaults and offensive imagery to maintain their preferred position in the existing social order, thereby perpetuating inequality and marginalization of certain groups. Carlson emphasizes the importance of recognizing this structural aspect to effectively address and mitigate the impact of hate speech in society.”

Chebrolu, E. “Free Speech and Loss in White Nationalist Rhetoric.” First Amendment Studies 54, no. 2 (2020): 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2020.1837652

• AI Summary: “In this article, E. Chebrolu examines how white nationalist rhetoric employs the concept of free speech as a means to articulate a sense of loss, particularly in the context of anti-Blackness. Chebrolu argues that white nationalists frame their grievances around a perceived erosion of their right to free expression, which they attribute to societal changes and the marginalization of their views. This rhetoric positions their ideology as a countercultural stance, portraying themselves as victims of censorship and social exclusion. By analyzing this narrative, Chebrolu highlights the ways in which the invocation of free speech serves to legitimize and perpetuate white nationalist ideologies under the guise of defending constitutional rights.”

Elers, Christine Helen, and Pooja Jayan. “‘This Is Us’: Free Speech Embedded in Whiteness, Racism and Coloniality in Aotearoa, New Zealand.” First Amendment Studies 54, no. 2 (2020): 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2020.1837654

• AI Summary: “Elers and Jayan critically examine the discourse surrounding free speech in Aotearoa (New Zealand), arguing that it is deeply embedded in structures of whiteness, racism, and coloniality. They contend that the prevailing liberal expressions of free speech often serve to dehumanize and marginalize Indigenous Māori and other minority groups. The authors highlight the ambivalence in New Zealand’s legislative acknowledgment of Māori sovereignty, as outlined in the Treaty of Waitangi, and how this reflects broader human rights violations. The article discusses instances where freedom of speech has been used as a shield to justify offensive and abusive attacks on Indigenous and minority communities, thereby perpetuating systemic inequalities. Elers and Jayan call for a re-examination of free speech that considers its implications on marginalized groups and challenges the dominant narratives that uphold white supremacy.”

Nasi, Francesco. “The Crisis of the Democratic Imaginary: How Anti-Democratic Imaginaries Foster Democratic Malaise.” Communication and Democracy 59, no. 1 (2025): 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2024.2434035

• AI Summary: “In this article, Francesco Nasi explores how certain contemporary social imaginaries—specifically the technocratic, neoliberal, and anti-political imaginaries—undermine the functioning of liberal democracies. He argues that while liberal democracy remains a widely accepted ideal, these anti-democratic imaginaries contribute to democratic malaise by fostering disillusionment and disengagement among citizens. Nasi emphasizes the importance of addressing these imaginaries to reinvigorate democratic practices and institutions.”

Salek, Thomas A. “Deflecting Deliberation through Rhetorical Nihilism: ‘Stop the Steal’ as an Unethical and Intransigent Rival Public.” Communication and Democracy 57, no. 1 (2023): 94-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2023.2202744

• AI Summary: “In this article, Thomas A. Salek analyzes the “Stop the Steal” movement, which emerged following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, and its impact on democratic deliberation. Salek argues that the movement constituted a “rival public”—an alternative discourse community that actively deflected rational debate and democratic engagement. He introduces the concept of “rhetorical nihilism” to describe the movement’s argumentative strategy, where any means are employed to discredit opposing viewpoints and institutions, thereby undermining the public sphere. Salek identifies three primary tactics used by the “Stop the Steal” movement: Conspiratorial Rhetoric: Promoting baseless claims about election fraud to sow distrust; Misinformation and Disinformation: Spreading false or misleading information to confuse and mislead the public; and Paralipsis via Rhetorical Questions: Using rhetorical questions to imply wrongdoing without providing evidence. Salek concludes that these strategies were employed not to foster democratic discourse but to disrupt it, highlighting the challenges posed by such movements to the functioning of a healthy democratic society.”

Sobre, Miriam S., and Mark P. Orbe. “Introduction: Academic Freedom and Critical Pedagogy in an Age of Educational Intimidation.” Communication and Democracy 59, no. 1 (2025): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2025.2482595

• AI Summary: “In this article, Sobre and Orbe examine the contemporary challenges to academic freedom and critical pedagogy in educational environments increasingly characterized by political pressures and ideological control. They discuss how such pressures undermine the foundational principles of higher education, including the pursuit of knowledge, critical inquiry, and the fostering of democratic engagement. The authors call for a renewed commitment to defending academic freedom and promoting critical pedagogical practices that encourage open dialogue, diverse perspectives, and the questioning of dominant narratives. They argue that these efforts are essential for the health of democratic societies and the advancement of social justice.”

Sobre, Miriam S., and Ariel Seals. “The Rhetorical Strategies of Educational Intimidation: The Chilling Effects of Anti-DEI Legislation at a Hispanic Serving Institution in Texas.” Communication and Democracy 59, no. 1 (2025): 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2025.2488349

• AI Summary: “In this article, Sobre and Seals examine the impact of anti-Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) legislation on a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) in Texas. They identify several rhetorical strategies employed by policymakers and institutional actors to intimidate educators and students, thereby suppressing open discourse on race, identity, and social justice in academic settings. The authors argue that these rhetorical tactics contribute to a “chilling effect,” where educators and students self-censor to avoid potential legal and professional consequences. This environment undermines the core values of higher education, particularly in institutions serving marginalized communities, by stifling critical dialogue and the pursuit of social justice.”

Vats, Anjali, and Mohan J. Dutta. “Locating Freedom of Speech in an Era of Global White Nationalism.” First Amendment Studies 54, no. 2 (2020): 156-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2020.1838843

• AI Summary: “In this article, Vats and Dutta critically examine the concept of freedom of speech within the context of global white nationalism. They argue that traditional understandings of free speech often fail to account for how such freedoms can be exploited to perpetuate racist and exclusionary ideologies. The authors propose a reimagined framework that considers the social and political implications of free speech, emphasizing the need to balance individual rights with collective responsibility. By analyzing contemporary instances where free speech has been invoked to justify harmful rhetoric, Vats and Dutta call for a more nuanced approach that safeguards democratic values while addressing the challenges posed by white nationalist movements.”

Wentzel, Kayla, and Jennifer Lambe. “How Authoritarianism and Extraversion Relate to Censorship.” Communication and Democracy 59, no. 1 (2025): 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2025.2472640

• AI Summary: “In this study, Wentzel and Lambe investigate how personality traits—specifically extraversion and authoritarianism—correlate with individuals’ willingness to support censorship across various forms of expression. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of 2,850 U.S. adults, the researchers employed a revised version of Lambe’s Willingness to Censor scale, which assesses support for government censorship in categories such as pornography, hate speech, political speech, and more. The findings reveal that individuals exhibiting higher levels of left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) are more inclined to endorse censorship across all categories of expression. Conversely, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) shows a mixed relationship with censorship, being positively associated with support for censoring defamation, political speech, and pornography, but negatively associated with censoring abortion speech, hate speech, and privacy. Extraversion, a trait characterized by sociability and assertiveness, generally correlates negatively with support for censorship, suggesting that more extroverted individuals are less likely to favor restricting speech. However, when controlling for RWA, this negative association becomes more pronounced, indicating that extraverts may be particularly resistant to censorship when right-wing values are prevalent. The authors conclude that both LWA and RWA are linked to increased support for censorship, albeit in different ways, while extraversion tends to mitigate such support. These insights are timely, given the current media landscape’s shift towards dysregulation and uncensored content, and the contemporary alignment between Americans’ political and social identities. The study underscores the importance of considering individual personality traits in discussions about censorship and free speech.”

Zhang, Ningfeng, and Lily Díaz-Kommonen. “Toward a Rhetorical Understanding of Chinese Political Internet Memes Amid a Chinese Governance Crisis.” Communication and Democracy 58, no. 2 (2024): 226-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2024.2388647

• AI Summary: “In this empirical study, Zhang and Díaz-Kommonen explore the role of Chinese political internet memes as strategic rhetorical devices during a period of governance crisis in China. They argue that these memes enable civic ideological expressions within a constrained public sphere, serving as a form of resistance and commentary on political issues. The authors analyze the content and dissemination of these memes to understand how they function rhetorically in a highly controlled media environment.”

Communication and Race

Bulut, Ergin, and Basak Can. “The Persistence of Race, Violence, and State in a Post-Truth World.” Communication and Race 1, no. 1 (2024): 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/28346955.2024.2308885

• AI Summary: “In this article, Bulut and Can critically examine the interplay between race, state violence, and the dissemination of post-truth narratives, particularly within the context of Turkey. They argue that the nation-state plays a pivotal role in constructing and perpetuating racialized regimes of truth and post-truth, often through mechanisms that involve the creation of doubt, infliction of humiliation, and denial of dignity towards racialized others. Bulut and Can call for scholars of disinformation to centralize race in their analyses and to adopt more transnational perspectives, recognizing that imperial legacies in the Global South both visibly and subtly enable the infliction of state violence on racialized minorities and their media producers.”

Communication Education de Carvalho, Raiana, and Raquel Moreira. “Centering Latin America: Gender Politics, Attacks on Higher Education, and Lessons of Resistance from Brazil.” Communication Education 74, no. 2 (2025): 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2025.2489477

• AI Summary: “In this essay, de Carvalho and Moreira examine the intersection of gender politics and higher education in Brazil, focusing on the challenges posed by far-right political movements. They highlight how these movements have targeted academic institutions, particularly those promoting gender studies and feminist scholarship. The authors emphasize the resilience and strategies of resistance employed by academics and activists in response to these attacks. By centering Latin American perspectives, the essay offers insights into the global implications of political interference in education and the importance of safeguarding academic freedom.”

Lawless, Brandi, C. Kyle Rudick, and Kathryn Golsan. “Distinguishing (the) Right from Wrong: Knowledge, Curriculum, and Intellectual Responsibility.” Communication Education 68, no. 4 (2019): 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1645871

• AI Summary: “In this article, Lawless, Rudick, and Golsan critically examine the political Right’s attacks on U.S. higher education, particularly the accusation that academics are too liberal. They argue that such claims often misuse arguments for freedom of speech and ideological diversity to undermine the mission of higher education. The authors assert that many ideas espoused by the political Right are deeply erroneous and harmful, rather than beneficial, to society’s ability to identify and address its problems. The article emphasizes the importance of safeguarding academic freedom and upholding the integrity of knowledge production and curriculum development in the face of these challenges.”

Soto-Vásquez, Arthur D. “Laboratory of Reaction: SB 17 in Texas, the Anti-DEI Movement, and Implications for Higher Education.” Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2025.2522760

• AI Summary: “In this article, Soto-Vásquez examines Texas Senate Bill 17 (SB 17), legislation passed in 2023 that imposes significant restrictions on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives within public higher education institutions in Texas. The author contextualizes SB 17 within a broader national movement aimed at dismantling DEI programs, analyzing the ideological foundations and strategies employed by think tanks and political actors advocating for such policies. Soto-Vásquez discusses the implications of these legislative actions for higher education, particularly concerning academic freedom, curriculum development, and the inclusivity of educational environments. The article positions SB 17 as part of a larger reactionary effort to reshape the landscape of higher education by challenging the integration of social justice principles into academic institutions.”

Waltman, Michael S. “The Normalizing of Hate Speech and How Communication Educators Should Respond.” Communication Education 67, no. 2 (2018): 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1430370

• AI Summary: “In this essay, Waltman examines the increasing normalization of hate speech in U.S. political discourse, highlighting its transition from fringe groups to mainstream political rhetoric. He attributes this shift to factors such as the rise of “alternative facts,” the rejection of fact-based truth claims, and political campaigns that intentionally divided Americans into tribes. Waltman argues that hate speech is not merely offensive language but a deliberate attempt to dehumanize others, rendering their identity and humanity questionable. He emphasizes the role of communication educators in addressing this issue, advocating for pedagogical strategies that promote critical thinking, foster inclusive dialogues, and challenge the normalization of hate in academic settings.”

Critical Studies in Media Communication

Neville-Shepard, Ryan. “Trump and the Truthers: Populist Demophobia and the Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory.” Critical Studies in Media Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2025.2517016

• AI Summary: “Neville-Shepard explores how Trump’s populist rhetoric, characterized by a distrust of elites and mainstream narratives, has contributed to the normalization and spread of conspiracy theories. He argues that Trump’s political discourse has emboldened conspiracy theorists, providing them with a platform and a sense of legitimacy. The article delves into the specific case of the Sandy Hook conspiracy theory, analyzing how it has been utilized within the broader context of populist demophobia—the fear and suspicion of elites and established institutions. By examining the rhetorical strategies employed by Trump and his supporters, Neville-Shepard highlights the dangers of populist demophobia in undermining public trust in factual information and democratic institutions. The article calls for a critical examination of the ways in which political rhetoric can facilitate the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories, urging communication scholars and educators to address these issues in their work.”

Sahoo, Sananda. “India’s Internet Shutdowns as Biopolitics: The Formation of Political Will and Opinion through Collective Action under Attack.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 40, no. 5 (2023): 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2023.2265995

• AI Summary: “In this article, Sahoo examines India’s frequent use of internet shutdowns as a form of biopolitical control, analyzing how such measures suppress collective action and the formation of political will. The study highlights the state’s strategic use of digital disconnection to manage dissent and control public opinion, particularly in regions experiencing unrest. By disrupting communication channels, these shutdowns hinder the public’s ability to organize, share information, and engage in democratic processes. Sahoo argues that this practice not only infringes upon individual freedoms but also undermines the very foundation of democratic participation and collective agency.”

Serazio, Michael. “Encoding the Paranoid Style in American Politics: ‘Anti-Establishment’ Discourse and Power in Contemporary Spin.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 33, no. 2 (2016): 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1174338

• AI Summary: “In this article, Serazio analyzes how contemporary political discourse employs a “paranoid style”—a term coined by historian Richard Hofstadter in 1964 to describe a particular mode of political rhetoric characterized by suspicion, conspiracy theories, and a dichotomous worldview. Serazio examines how political figures and media outlets use this style to construct an “anti-establishment” narrative that positions elites as corrupt and the public as victims of manipulation. Through a combination of textual analysis and interviews with political consultants, he explores how this rhetoric serves to mobilize support by tapping into public fears and frustrations, thereby consolidating power and influencing public opinion.” Volčič, Zala. “Yugo-Nostalgia: Cultural Memory and Media in the Former Yugoslavia.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 24, no. 1 (2007) 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701214496 AI Summary: “In this article, Volčič examines the phenomenon of Yugo-nostalgia—an emotional longing for the former country of Yugoslavia—experienced by some individuals in its successor countries. She explores how media and other cultural practices are mobilized in former-Yugoslav communities to recreate a shared cultural memory. Yugo-nostalgia paradoxically harkens back to a shared cultural history, even as it provides the raw material for new forms of national identities that continue to divide the former-Yugoslav republics. Volčič discusses how elements of the socialist past, such as the image of Josip Broz Tito, are appropriated in contemporary media and advertising to evoke a sense of unity and nostalgia. For instance, in 1999, a Slovenian advertisement used Tito’s image to market luxury cars, symbolizing the country’s transition to a consumer society while simultaneously invoking the utopian aspirations of the past. This appropriation reflects a complex relationship with the past, where nostalgia for a perceived better time is intertwined with current socio-political realities. The article delves into the complexities of collective memory, highlighting how media representations of the past can both unite and divide. While Yugo-nostalgia fosters a sense of shared history and identity, it also underscores the challenges of post-Yugoslav nationalisms and the ongoing process of redefining national identities in the region.”

Journal of International and Intercultural Communication

Aoki, Eric, and Kyle M. Jonas. “Collective Memory and Sacred Space in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Reconciliation and Rehumanization Processes in Mureithi’s ICYIZERE.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 9, no. 3 (2016): 240-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2016.1195007

• AI Summary: “In this article, Aoki and Jonas analyze Patrick Mureithi’s 2009 documentary, ICYIZERE: Hope, which captures a reconciliation workshop conducted by Healing and Rebuilding Our Communities (HROC) in post-genocide Rwanda. The authors argue that the workshop depicted in the film creates a “sacred/secular space” where participants engage in a transformative process of rehumanization. This space is produced through negotiations of dialectical tensions between past and present, as well as individual and collective memory. The documentary showcases how participants reinterpret the “Other” through empathetic human interaction and identity-widening processes, facilitating a collective healing journey. The authors employ identity-widening theory to analyze how these interactions help expand participants’ identities to include broader, more inclusive understandings, moving beyond the divisive “us versus them” mentality.”

Bhat, Prashanth, and Kalyani Chadha. “Anti-Media Populism: Expressions of Media Distrust by Right-Wing Media in India.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 13, no. 2 (2020): 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1739320

• AI Summary: “Bhat and Chadha analyze content from OpIndia, a prominent right-wing news website in India, to understand how it contributes to anti-media populism. The article outlines several strategies employed by OpIndia to delegitimize mainstream media. The study positions these tactics within the broader context of global anti-media populism, drawing parallels with similar movements in Western democracies. It also highlights the challenges faced by journalists in India, including self-censorship and threats, as a result of this hostile media environment.” de Souza, Rebecca, and Hussain, Syed Ali. “‘Howdy Modi!’: Mediatization, Hindutva, and Long Distance Ethnonationalism.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 16, no. 2 (2023): 138-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2021.1987505 AI Summary: “Rebecca de Souza and Syed Ali Hussain’s 2023 article, “Howdy Modi!”: Mediatization, Hindutva, and Long Distance Ethnonationalism, published in the Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, analyzes the media coverage of the 2019 “Howdy Modi!” rally in Houston, Texas. The study examines how this heavily mediatized event advanced an ethnonationalist “American Hindutva” agenda. Through content and framing analysis of news articles from September 2019, the authors identify six key topics: spectacle, hype, and optics; Trump-Modi support; anti-Modi protests; negative coverage; anti-Islam/anti-Pakistan sentiments; and idealizing Modi. Frames such as “rock star Prime Minister” and “Modi as an embodiment of (Hindu) grace” were prevalent. The media coverage reinforced Hindu nationalism by drawing upon cultural pride and anti-Muslim sentiment, representing a new and “spreadable” venue for its proliferation.”

Graiouid, Said. “Critical International Communication and the Public Sphere: Theoretical Engagments with Tahakkum and Other-Interculturality.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 17, no. 4 (2024): 365-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2024.2389799

• AI Summary: “Graiouid argues that tahakkum (Arabic: التَّحَكُّمِ), meaning “domination,” hinders the functioning of the public sphere by reflecting the authoritarian state’s failure to foster plural deliberation and good governance. He illustrates this through two critical cases: the decline of Islamist influence and the Hirak movement against water privatization in a southeastern Moroccan oasis town. These cases demonstrate how power dynamics and state control impede open public discourse. In response, Graiouid proposes other-interculturality as an alternative epistemological and ethical framework. This approach emphasizes intercultural communication that interrogates embedded layers of power and domination, champions collective solidarity, and celebrates diversity without occluding difference. It seeks to create a more inclusive and equitable public sphere by recognizing and addressing systemic inequalities. The article contributes to the field of critical intercultural communication by integrating indigenous perspectives and challenging dominant paradigms that often overlook power structures and cultural nuances.”

Khrebtan-Hörhager, Julia, and Evgeniya Pyatovskaya. “Russian Women, Ukraine War, and (Neglected) Writing on the Wall: From the (Im)possibility of World Traveling to Failing Feminist Alliances. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 17, no. 1 (2024): 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2023.2265992

• AI Summary: “The article “Russian Women, Ukraine War, and (Neglected) Writing on the Wall: From the (Im)possibility of World Traveling to Failing Feminist Alliances” by Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager and Evgeniya Pyatovskaya, published in the Journal of International and Intercultural Communication in 2024, examines the role of Russian feminist and resistance groups during the Russia-Ukraine war. The authors highlight organizations such as Pussy Riot, the Feminist Antiwar Resistance (FAR), and its branch Les Pleureuses as significant agents of social change and cultural opposition. They argue that these groups have been instrumental in challenging the authoritarian and patriarchal structures within Russia, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict. The paper introduces the concept of “Second World Feminism,” positioning Russian feminism as a cultural product that offers a unique perspective within the broader framework of transnational feminism. The authors analyze how these feminist collectives have resisted militarism and authoritarianism, and they advocate for the inclusion of Russian feminist perspectives in global feminist alliances. Through their analysis, Khrebtan-Hörhager and Pyatovskaya emphasize the importance of recognizing the contributions of Russian feminist movements to peace and resistance efforts, challenging the narrative that confines women to roles of passive victims in times of war.”

Lacy, Michael G. “White Innocence Heroes: Recovery, Reversals, Paternalism, and David Duke.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 3, no. 3 (2010): 206-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2010.487221

• AI Summary: “Michael G. Lacy’s 2010 article, “White Innocence Heroes: Recovery, Reversals, Paternalism, and David Duke,” published in the Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, critically examines the rhetorical strategies employed by David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader and Nazi sympathizer, to reframe his racist past and position himself as an antiracist advocate. Lacy analyzes a 1989 letter to the editor by Duke, written shortly before his Louisiana State Senate victory, in which Duke attempts to justify his previous support for white supremacy by invoking narratives of personal transformation and white paternalism. Duke’s rhetoric suggests that white individuals have a moral obligation to “rescue” Black communities from welfare dependency and to “save” white communities from affirmative action policies, thereby promoting a return to “rugged individualism.” Lacy argues that such narratives serve to sanitize histories of white supremacy, allowing individuals like Duke to maintain a facade of innocence and moral superiority. This process of “white innocence” is not unique to Duke but is also evident in broader political discourse, such as the 2008 McCain-Palin presidential campaign, where similar themes of recovery and paternalism were prevalent. By critically analyzing these rhetorical strategies, Lacy highlights how they perpetuate white privilege and obscure the ongoing legacies of racism in American society. In summary, Lacy’s article provides a critical examination of how white individuals and political figures can manipulate narratives of personal redemption and racial paternalism to obscure their racist histories and maintain positions of power and privilege.”

Quarterly Journal of Speech

Aronis, Carolin, and Eric Aoki. “Nooses and Nazi Swastikas on U.S. Campuses: An Anti-Racist Call for a Rhetorical Reframing of Hate Symbols as Violent Technologies.” Quarterly Journal of Speech. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2024.2377195

• AI Summary: “In their 2024 article, “Nooses and Nazi Swastikas on U.S. Campuses: An Anti-Racist Call for a Rhetorical Reframing of Hate Symbols as Violent Technologies,” Carolin Aronis and Eric Aoki critique how U.S. universities respond to hate incidents involving nooses and Nazi swastikas. They argue that university administrations often frame these acts as mere “symbols of hate,” which minimizes their impact and fails to address the material, spatial, and historical dimensions of the violence involved. By coining the term “technologies of violence,” the authors advocate for a rhetorical shift that recognizes these objects as active agents of oppression, deeply embedded in systemic racism and antisemitism. This approach calls for a more robust, anti-racist response to such incidents, emphasizing the need to treat them as acts of violence rather than symbolic expressions.”

Bosmajian, Haig A. “The Nazi Speaker’s Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 46, no. 4 (1960): 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636009382435

• AI Summary: “Haig A. Bosmajian’s 1960 article, “The Nazi Speaker’s Rhetoric,” published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, offers a critical analysis of the rhetorical strategies employed by Nazi orators to manipulate public perception and facilitate the rise of totalitarianism. Bosmajian examines how Nazi speakers utilized persuasive language to dehumanize targeted groups, such as Jews, and to justify aggressive expansionism. He identifies specific rhetorical techniques, including the use of euphemisms, scapegoating, and appeals to nationalism, which served to legitimize violence and oppression. The analysis underscores the power of rhetoric in shaping public consciousness and enabling authoritarian regimes to gain and maintain power. This study contributes to the field of rhetorical criticism by illustrating the mechanisms through which language can be weaponized to support harmful ideologies. It serves as a cautionary reminder of the importance of critical engagement with political discourse to prevent the manipulation of public sentiment.”

Daniel, James Rushing. “Rewriting the Plan of the World: Peter Thiel’s Messianic Rhetoric and the End of Progressive Neoliberalism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 111, no. 2 (2025): 272-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2024.2340046

• AI Summary: “James Rushing Daniel’s 2024 article, “Rewriting the Plan of the World: Peter Thiel’s Messianic Rhetoric and the End of Progressive Neoliberalism”, published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, critically examines how Peter Thiel, a prominent tech entrepreneur, employs messianic rhetoric to advocate for a radical reimagining of capitalism. Daniel argues that Thiel’s discourse seeks to dismantle the prevailing neoliberal order, which he characterizes as “progressive neoliberalism,” and replace it with a more exclusionary and aggressive form of capitalism. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of Saint Paul’s theology, Daniel contends that Thiel adopts a Pauline stance to envision a “plērōma” (fullness) of capitalism—preserving the profit motive while discarding the progressive elements associated with neoliberalism. This analysis positions Thiel as a central figure in a broader far-right movement aiming to reshape global capitalism by blending theological language with economic ideology. By framing Thiel’s rhetoric within the context of contemporary neoliberal discourse, Daniel highlights the adaptability of neoliberalism as a rhetorical logic capable of incorporating arguments from across the political spectrum. The article underscores the significance of billionaire entrepreneurs as influential rhetors in shaping the ideological landscape of 21st-century capitalism.

Ghazal Aswad, Noor. “The U.S. American Left and Reverse Moral Exceptionalism: When Do Villains Become Heroes?.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 109, no. 4 (2023): 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2023.2250580

• AI Summary: “In her 2023 article, “The U.S. American Left and Reverse Moral Exceptionalism: When Do Villains Become Heroes?”, published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, Noor Ghazal Aswad introduces the concept of “reverse moral exceptionalism” to critique how U.S. progressive discourses often center the United States as the sole agent of global harm, inadvertently marginalizing the voices of those directly affected by imperial actions. Aswad uses the 2020 U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani as a case study. While many in the U.S. left viewed Soleimani’s death as a dangerous escalation, people in Iran, Iraq, and Syria celebrated it, seeing it as a moment of justice against a figure responsible for significant repression in their countries. This disparity highlighted a disconnect between U.S. leftist perspectives and the lived experiences of those in the Middle East. Aswad argues that reverse moral exceptionalism—an ideology that critiques U.S. imperialism but still centers U.S. narratives—obscures the agency and voices of those in revolutionary struggles abroad. This approach, she contends, inadvertently perpetuates a form of colonialism by failing to recognize the complexities of global resistance movements. Aswad’s analysis calls for a more nuanced understanding of international solidarity, one that listens to and amplifies the voices of those directly affected by imperial actions, rather than imposing external narratives that may not align with their realities.”

Ghazal Aswad, Noor. “Cultivating Radical Care and Otherwise Possibilities at the End of the World.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 110, no. 2 (2024): 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2024.2323672

• AI Summary: “In her 2024 essay, “Cultivating Radical Care and Otherwise Possibilities at the End of the World,” published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, Noor Ghazal Aswad examines how radical subjects—individuals engaged in embodied resistance against oppressive systems—navigate and reimagine the world amid crises such as environmental degradation, patriarchy, and geopolitical conflict. Through these frameworks, Aswad advocates for a reimagining of how we might foster radical care and solidarities with those in pursuit of hope, justice, and liberation.”

Gilbert, Christopher J. “The Diapered Donald: Comic Infantilizations of a U.S. American President.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 107, no. 3 (2021): 328-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2021.1945132

• AI Summary: “Christopher J. Gilbert’s 2021 article, “The Diapered Donald: Comic Infantilizations of a U.S. American President,” published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, critically examines how satirical portrayals of Donald Trump utilize infantilization to diminish his presidential authority. Gilbert argues that such comedic representations serve to blunt the rhetorical force of Trump’s presidency by depicting him as a figure of ridicule rather than a formidable political leader. The analysis delves into how these portrayals function rhetorically, suggesting that they not only undermine Trump’s image but also reflect broader societal dynamics concerning power and authority. Gilbert’s work contributes to the understanding of political humor and its role in shaping public perception of political figures.”

Kelly, Casey Ryan. “Donald J. Trump and the Rhetoric of Ressentiment.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 106, no. 1 (2020): 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1698756

• AI Summary: “In his 2020 article, “Donald J. Trump and the Rhetoric of Ressentiment,” published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, Casey Ryan Kelly analyzes the emotional and moral dimensions of President Donald Trump’s rhetoric, focusing on how he employs ressentiment—a concept rooted in Nietzschean philosophy—to shape public discourse. Kelly defines ressentiment as a condition where individuals, feeling powerless and impotent, internalize their frustrations and transform them into a moral framework that justifies their victimhood and desire for revenge. In Trump’s speeches, this manifests as a narrative where he portrays himself and his supporters as victims of societal elites, media, and political opponents, thereby legitimizing their grievances and calls for retribution. Through rhetorical analysis of Trump’s rally speeches, Kelly demonstrates how he constructs a dichotomy between virtuous victims and corrupt adversaries. This inversion of moral values—where victimhood is seen as virtuous and the oppressed are depicted as morally superior—serves to mobilize support by appealing to emotions of anger and injustice. However, Kelly argues that this strategy ultimately undermines democratic values by promoting a cycle of grievance and revenge over constructive political engagement. By framing Trump’s rhetoric within the concept of ressentiment, Kelly provides a critical lens through which to understand the emotional undercurrents of his political appeal and the implications for democratic discourse.”

Lee, Michael J. “The Populist Chameleon: The People’s Party, Huey Long, George Wallace, and the Populist Argumentative Frame.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 92, no. 4 (2006): 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630601080385

• AI Summary: “Michael J. Lee’s 2006 article, “The Populist Chameleon: The People’s Party, Huey Long, George Wallace, and the Populist Argumentative Frame”, published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, explores the enduring structure of populist rhetoric in U.S. political history. Lee identifies a consistent “argumentative frame” that underpins various populist movements, despite their differing political content and contexts. Lee traces these themes through the rhetoric of the People’s Party, Huey Long, and George Wallace, illustrating how each adapted this frame to their specific political contexts. He concludes by analyzing the link between populism’s persistence in U.S. history and the nation’s Founding, suggesting that the populist frame taps into foundational narratives of American identity and democracy.”

Young, Michael. “Towards a Rhetorica Theory of Charisma: Corinthians, Cults, and Demagogic Criticism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2024.2427019

• AI Summary: “Michael Young’s 2024 article, “Towards a Rhetorical Theory of Charisma: Corinthians, Cults, and Demagogic Criticism”, published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, offers a critical examination of the concept of charisma within rhetorical studies. Young proposes that charisma is not merely an inherent quality of a leader but is constructed through rhetorical practices that violate established norms. He draws upon the Apostle Paul’s letters to the Corinthians to illustrate how early Christian rhetoric employed unconventional strategies to establish authority and influence. This analysis extends to contemporary contexts, where similar rhetorical tactics are observed in cults and demagogic movements. By challenging traditional norms, these rhetorical practices create a sense of exceptionalism that can lead to the formation of charismatic authority. Young’s work contributes to a deeper understanding of how charisma functions rhetorically and its implications for both religious and political discourse.”