Default background decorative image

Scientific Characters: Rhetoric, Politics, and Trust in Breast Cancer Research

article resource:
NCA Bookshelf

Lisa Keru00e4nenTuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010

Moving back and forth between news coverage, medical journals, letters to the editor, and oncology pamphlets, Lisa Keru00e4nen draws insights from rhetoric, literary studies, sociology, and science studies to analyze the roles of character in shaping the outcomes of the u201cDatagateu201d controversy, a scientific dispute that erupted after a 1994 Chicago Tribune headline: u201cFraud in Breast Cancer Research: Doctor Lied on Data for Decade.u201d Throughout the scandal, debates about the character of surgeon and researcher Dr. Bernard Fisher and other key players endured, showing how scientific knowledge is shaped by perceptions of the personal temperament, trustworthiness, integrity, and transparency of those who produce it. As administrators, politicians, scientists, patients, journalists, and citizens attempted to make sense of what had happened, and to assess the integrity of the research, they raised questions, assigned blame, attributed responsibility, and reshaped the norms of scientific practice.