The statements below contain the positions officially endorsed by the researchers, teachers, and practitioners allied as the National Communication Association related to issues vital to the professional endeavors of Communication educators and scholars. The Association is committed to including within each statement only positions:

  • Upon which the organization and membership have engaged in ample and careful deliberation
  • Upon which a substantial consensus of supporting knowledge has been developed
  • Addressing issues that have attracted the concerted inquiry of an acknowledged segment of the discipline
  • Central to the enhancement of the ability of Communication educators/scholars to do their work effectively and/or to the enhancement of the stature of the discipline in the academy or more broadly

This policy platform contains the positions officially endorsed by the researchers, teachers, and practitioners allied as the National Communication Association on issues vital to human communication. The Association is committed to include within this document only positions: (1) upon which the organization and membership have engaged in ample and careful deliberation; (2) upon which a substantial consensus of supporting knowledge has been developed; (3) addressing issues which have attracted the concerted inquiry of an acknowledged segment of the discipline, and (4) central to the contribution of communication to the health and richness of the human condition, or to the commitments of the membership to the study, teaching, or practice of communication.

Public Policy Statement Archive

The following public policy statements are no longer active because they are not currently central to the contribution of communication but are listed here for historic purposes.

This ethical statements platform contains the positions officially endorsed by the researchers, teachers, and practitioners allied as the National Communication Association related to general beliefs of right and wrong that can guide more specific decisions of the association and members of the discipline. The Association is committed to include within this document only positions: (1) upon which the organization and membership have engaged in ample and careful deliberation; (2) upon which a substantial consensus of supporting knowledge has been developed; (3) addressing issues which have attracted the concerted inquiry of an acknowledged segment of the discipline, and (4) central to the concerns of communication scholars and teachers.

This academic/professional statements platform contains the positions officially endorsed by the researchers, teachers, and practitioners allied as the National Communication Association related to issues that are vital to the professional endeavors of communication educators and scholars. The Association is committed to include within this document only positions: (1) upon which the organization and membership have engaged in ample and careful deliberation; (2) upon which a substantial consensus of supporting knowledge has been developed; (3) addressing issues which have attracted the concerted inquiry of an acknowledged segment of the discipline, and (4) central to the enhancement of the ability of communication educators/scholars to do their work effectively and/or to the enhancement of the stature of the discipline in the academy or more broadly.

Academic/Professional Statements Archive

The following academic/professional statements are no longer active because they are not currently central to the contribution of communication but are listed here for historic purposes.


Public Policy Statements

The National Communication Association should only take an official stand on those policy issues that are central to the contribution of Communication to the health and richness of the human condition or to the commitments of the membership to the study, teaching, or practice of Communication.

Ethical Statements

The National Communication Association should only take an official stand on those ethical issues that can guide more specific decisions of the association and members of the discipline.

Academic/Professional Statements

The National Communication Association should only take an official stand on those academic/professional issues for which support for a particular position would enhance the ability of Communication educators/scholars to do their work effectively and/or enhance the stature of the discipline in the academy or more broadly.

Procedure for Proposing and Adopting Resolutions for Inclusion into NCA’s Resolution Platform:

  1. Members of the Association shall be invited to submit resolutions to the Resolutions Committee for consideration for inclusion in the NCA Resolution and Statement Platform. The procedures for submitting resolutions shall be printed annually in the Association’s newsletter or similar outlet. In addition, the Executive Director shall remind all NCA members that they are invited to contact the Resolutions Committee Chair directly to discuss a resolution proposal.
  2. Proposed resolutions must include the following content to be considered appropriate for Legislative Assembly consideration:
    1. The type of Resolution/Statement under consideration (Public Policy, Ethical, Academic/Professional)
    2. Rationale for why it merits Legislative Assembly consideration and how it meets the criteria for inclusion in the platform specified in the Preamble
    3. Background information regarding the public policy issue being addressed
    4. Demonstration of the relationship of the issue to existing Communication scholarship, including specific citations
    5. Specific action being requested
    6. Specific actions the Association will be expected to take if the resolution passes
    7. An assessment of the resources required to implement the resolution.
  3. NCA members may submit proposed resolutions to the Resolutions Committee from the end of the Annual Convention until June 30th of the following year. The Legislative Assembly will consider proposed resolutions submitted by June 30th if the Resolutions Committee determines they meet the specified requirements. Provided that the Resolutions Committee determines the specified requirements have been met, proposed resolutions submitted after the June 30th deadline will require a majority vote by the Legislative Assembly to be considered by the body.
  4. The Resolutions Committee is required to review all proposed resolutions it receives. The review must include confirmation that the necessary content is included in the proposal and a determination that enough information is provided to allow the LA to make a thoughtful judgment about the issue. The Resolutions Committee may contact proposal submitters to request additional information and/or do due diligence research on its own with support from the National Office. The Resolutions Committee can determine that a proposed resolution does not meet the requirements for submission and, therefore, should not be considered by the LA. If the Resolutions Committee determines that the LA should consider a proposed resolution, it must make one of the following recommendations: accept, reject, no recommendation, accept with the following amendments. Before making its recommendation, the Resolutions Committee may refer the proposed resolution to another committee with particular expertise on the issue for recommendation.
  5. The Chair of the Resolutions Committee shall present resolutions to the Legislative Assembly. Presentations should include a summary of the proposal, the results of any additional inquiry undertaken by the Resolutions Committee, and the recommendation of the Resolutions Committee. The recommendation of the Resolutions Committee should be presented with substantial justification.
  6. Resolutions shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of those present and voting at the Legislative Assembly meeting to be included in the Public Policy Platform.

NCA Members are invited to submit resolution proposals for consideration by the Resolutions Committee by June 30. All proposed resolutions submitted by the June 30 deadline shall be published on the website prior to September 1. All resolutions are reviewed by the Resolutions Committee for its recommendation to the Legislative Assembly, who will review, deliberate, and vote on approval.

Please review the procedures for submission and review of public statement proposals or contact Justin Danowski, Executive Director (jdanowski@natcom.org) with questions about submitting a proposal.

 

Resolutions Committee

    • Curtis Ladrillo Chamblee, University of Memphis
    • Margaret R. LaWare, Iowa State University
    • Jacqueline Peters, Concordia University
    • Heather L. Walters, Missouri State University
    • Mathieu Balay, Université de Montréal
    • Clover Baker-Brown, Prince George’s Community College