by
Derek R. Lane, Investigator, and James
Applegate, NCA President
It has been nine months since NCA institutional and unit
members were first encouraged to contribute to a comprehensive extramural
funding database that would function to identify agencies and foundations that
have supported communication scholars and their research.
Ultimately, NCA will use the results of this project to
construct a searchable online database that allows members to search by topic or
agency to discover colleagues who have grants in particular areas or with
certain agencies. We also will link this site to similar databases in related
disciplines.
The initial survey was conducted by Derek Lane and the database was
housed at the University of Kentucky.
You may search the survey data, or add a record to the
survey database, by clicking the appropriate links on the left.
Teams more successful
Successful funding proposals typically require a team of
researchers with specific areas of expertise that match the demands of the
funding request from agencies. By linking scholars across institutions and
across disciplines NCA hopes to contribute to successful proposals by members
that fund important basic, applied, or teaching scholarship. In many cases work
that needs to be done cannot be accomplished without extramural funding.
Moreover, funding from outside agencies, regardless of the amount, contributes
to the stature and success of programs within both teaching and research
institutions.
The likelihood of developing successful research funding
proposals can be significantly improved with accurate information regarding
extramural funding. All heads of
NCA departmental members were sent instructions on how to log in departmental
grant information. If you have questions after consulting with our chair or dean
contact the NCA office. We will provide an updated report on responses later in
the year. We would like to have many more responses quickly to incorporate into
the database.
As encouraging as these initial results are we know there
is much more funding in the discipline and encourage members to submit through
their unit heads information on their funded work. The larger the database the
more useful it will be in supporting more funding.
Funding is available
NCA has sponsored numerous programs and workshops to
provide assistance for those in need of funding for their scholarship. Still,
many communication teachers and researchers seem to be discouraged by the belief
that the discipline is not very “fundable.” Preliminary results suggest that
funding is available for diverse areas of communication research. However, an
accurate picture of the fundable nature of communication will not be available
until all NCA members ensure that their extramural grants supporting basic,
applied, or teaching scholarship are included in the database.
Initial report
The database currently consists of 140 entries representing
22 colleges and universities. The
vast majority (96%) are public.
Preliminary results indicate that the primary role of the communication scholar
in the funding sources represented is primary investigator (71%) followed by
co-investigator (13%) and consultant (6%).
Funding is reported from both government/federal (64%, n=90) sources as
well private/nonprofit (36%, n=50) sources and range from $5000 to over
$25,000,000 (see Table 1).
Database entries show communication scholars collaborating
with colleagues in business, educational psychology, family studies, nursing,
organizational management, psychology, sociology and women’s studies (to name
but a few).
Scholars have secured funding from organizations as varied
as the National Science Foundation (NCA is currently working at the national
level to further strengthen our presence at NSF with the help of our funded NSF
scholars), AMC Cancer Center, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research,
Centers for Disease Control, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Council for
European Studies, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Mediascope,
Inc., National Foreign Lan-guage Center, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, U.S. Department of
Defense, U.S. Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, W.
K. Kellogg Foundation, Lilly Corporation.