Pratt
wins Newberry Library Fellowship
Steven
B. Pratt, Professor of Communication at the University of Central
Oklahoma, has won a prestigious Newberry Library fellowship.
Pratt will be traveling to the library in Chicago this summer to
make use of the collection and attend regularly scheduled seminars, as
well as a weekly library-wide colloquium.
Pratt
will be in residence at the D’Arcy McNickle Center for the History of
the American Indian, which sponsors a program called “Indian Voices in
the Academy.” The program
is funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the
Rockefeller Foundation.
Pratt’s
work focuses on the nature of what
he calls “Indian-ness.” He
contends that the definition of what makes an Indian is unclear, not
only because it varies from tribe to tribe but because many individuals
of Indian ancestry are not culturally competent as members of their
tribes. For example, Pratt argues that most college students of
Indian ancestry are not culturally competent, because they have not yet
learned how to be reflective about their own behavior. He said that he has seen college students become excited about
learning public speaking skills only to return to their tribes and learn
that only elders may speak on public matters; those who have opinions
but are barred from speaking must find someone to speak for them.
Pratt,
a member of the Osage tribe, has written that a person can be culturally
competent as an Indian, as a member of a tribe, as both, or as neither.
To be culturally competent as an Indian requires that an
individual have knowledge of a variety of tribes and enact behaviors
that would be culturally acceptable to Indians generally.
To be culturally competent as an Osage means that the individual
knows and can enact the behaviors that are specific to the Osage tribe.
An individual could be socialized as an Osage but have no
knowledge of or contact with Indians generally, or an individual could
have an identity as an Indian and come from an Osage family but have
little or no specific knowledge of Osage behaviors.
Finally, an individual could qualify to be classified as an
Indian legally but have little or no understanding of the behaviors that
would need to be enacted in order to be accepted, culturally, either as
an Indian or as a tribal member.
Pratt
has criticized much of the research done on the attitudes and behavior
of Indians as not taking into account the cultural competence of those
from whom the data were gathered. He
plans to use his time at the Newberry Library to survey the literature
on Indian behaviors to determine the various ways in which Indians have
been portrayed by researchers. For
example, he plans to look at the various terms used to describe
indigenous peoples (Indians, American Indians, Native Americans) to see
what assumptions underlie each of these terms.
He also wants to explore why Indians have the highest rate of
high school dropouts for any ethnic group but also have the fastest
growing rate of university attendance.
He believes that there will be a cultural disparity at the root
of this seeming contradiction of statistics.
Pratt
expressed hope that his research would aid in eliminating the
overgeneralizations he finds about Indians in college textbooks, even
those in communication. He
also indicated that he wanted his research to help communication
professors to make their courses culturally appropriate for their Indian
students.