Guggenheim to support
Gross Up From Invisibility
No one looking at the
young woman who walked into a lesbian bar in Los Angeles in the summer of 1947 would have
suspected that they were witnessing a milestone in American social history. A twenty-six
year old secretary who called herself Lisa Ben (an anagram of lesbian) was distributing
copies of a new publication she had created called Vice Versa because
in those days our kind of life was considered a vice. The magazine consisted of only
15 type-written pages, but it signaled the first stirrings of the modern gay rights
movement in the United States.
So wrote Larry Gross, Sol
Worth professor at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of
Pennsylvania, in the opening of his application for a Guggenheim fellowship. Gross
proposal was funded by the Guggenheim Foundation, and as a result he will be spending the
1998-99 academic year completing work on a book titled, Up From Invisibility: Lesbians,
Gay Men and the Media in America.
Gross was trained as a social
psychologist (B.A., Brandeis; Ph.D., Columbia) but found that the then narrow
disciplinary confines of social psychology stifled my interests in art, culture and
history, as he put it in his application. The study of communication, especially
media, offered me the opportunity to bridge disciplinary approaches and methods,
thinking about the arts in social and historical perspective, as carriers and articulators
of basic beliefs about the nature of things and about the moral order.
Gross will seek to develop
parallel narratives in Up From Invisibility. Hell not only be looking at the
emergence of the lesbian and gay community in the United States since World War II, but
hell also be examining how media developed as well. The two interact, he believes,
because having media gives a community an identity; media not only bring a community
together but shape it as well. Thats why portrayals of lesbians and gays in
mainstream media are so important, Gross contends. Many lesbian and gay individuals are
either isolated or uncertain about their sexuality, and media portrayals present
information about who these individuals think they are supposed to be (or not
supposed to be).
While others have published
histories of the lesbian and gay press, and mainstream news media, as well as analyses of
portrayals of lesbians and gay men in film, Gross wants to include television and newer
technologies such as the Internet. He believes that lesbian and gay characters have never
really been invisible, that theyve always been present in television.
Until more recently, however, their sexualities have not been explicitly acknowledged.
Like ethnic minorities before them who were denied a sexuality in media programming,
lesbians and gay men have often assumed the role of sexless sidekick. Yet,
lesbian and gay audiences were very aware of potentially gay characters; for example,
lesbian bars were sponsoring Ellen-watching parties long before the
shows writers had ostensibly decided that their leading character was a lesbian.
Gross contends that minority audiences generally, and lesbian and gay audiences
particularly, become more sophisticated in reading media messages relating to
their portrayals; in essence they become bilingual. Camp is
nobodys mother tongue, Gross said, but media present gay audiences with
opportunities for double readings of hidden as well as surface meanings [with
current images of how camp is being done, thus allowing those audiences to
recognize those patterns again during later viewing].
Gross has been collecting data
for this project for a long time, and he indicated that his biggest challenge will be
which examples to include and which to leave out. Even so, he will most likely travel to
Cornell University, the New York and San Francisco Public Libraries, and the National
Lesbian and Gay Archive in Los Angeles as part of his work. In the process, he hopes to
co-mingle historical analysis with media analysis from the perspective of communication
theory to create a unique and significant work.