Carlin
to evaluate DebateWatch ’96 with Ford Foundation funding
Diana
Carlin, an associate professor of communication studies at the
University of Kansas, has studied U.S. presidential campaign debates for
a number of years. Her work
led her to believe that the debates could be a prime source of
information that citizens could use to make voting decisions in the
national campaign. She conducted a series of focus groups in 1992 to see how
citizens might best use the debates, and she published the report of
that work in a book titled, The
1992 Presidential Debates in Focus (Praeger, 1994).
One of the recommendations of the focus groups was that the
debates would make more sense to citizens if they could gather with
others and discuss them.
Working
with the Commission on Presidential Debates, the sponsoring
organization, Carlin created a program called DebateWatch.
The concept behind DebateWatch was simple: gather a group of
people to watch one of the debates together and to discuss it afterward.
Carlin created a packet of material to guide DebateWatch groups, and the
Commission expects to distribute tens of thousands of the packets
through groups that emphasize voter education.
The
Ford Foundation recently decided to back the project with a $200,000
grant to complete an evaluation of DebateWatch.
After a pilot study using focus groups in primary states Carlin
plans to work through SCA to locate 50-75 members to organize
DebateWatch groups. Carlin
and her assistants will also organize a DebateWatch group at each debate
site.
From
these groups a set of focus group participants will be selected.
A total of 12 focus groups will be conducted after the election
in sites around the country. At these focus groups, the researchers will
gather information about the insights the participants gained about the
debates that they would not have otherwise gotten from merely watching
them, how the participants used the information they gained from the
groups in making their voting decisions, and how effective was the
DebateWatch process. An
Internet discussion of the debates will also be organized by Mark Kuhn,
University of New Hampshire, and the content of that discussion will be
compared to that of the focus groups.
Carlin
and her associates plan to write a book on the focus group results, but
information about the impact of DebateWatch is likely to surface during
the campaign and after.
Chalk one up for another high-profile project emanating from
SCA’s political communication researchers.